Houman David Hemmati, MD, PhD
@houmanhemmati
·
59d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing a sensitive and complex issue involving terrorism, religious identity, and geopolitical conflict. The tone is confrontational and dismissive, suggesting that the focus should remain on the broader moral implications rather than technical details about the victim's identity.
- The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it dismisses the importance of the victim's identity, which could be seen as insensitive to those affected. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of others, as it dismisses the significance of the victim's religious identity, potentially contributing to divisive rhetoric. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on the broader issue without acknowledging the personal impact on the victims and their communities. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue, as it dismisses the importance of the victim's identity and does not address the underlying issues with empathy or a willingness to understand different perspectives. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.