Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement discusses the viewership of Fox News and suggests that understanding current politics requires watching the network. It implies a divide between those who watch and those who don't, and advises Democrats to watch Fox News to better understand politics.
- The statement does not directly harm others, but it implies that those who do not watch Fox News lack understanding, which could be seen as dismissive.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it suggests a divide and implies a lack of understanding among non-viewers. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it makes a broad generalization about understanding politics without inviting discussion. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to suggest a course of action (watching Fox News) but does not clearly aim for societal betterment.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by expressing an opinion, but it could be more responsible by encouraging open dialogue rather than implying a lack of understanding among non-viewers.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.