The statement questions the focus of public discourse, suggesting that certain topics are less important than others that pose a real threat. It implies a critique of media and public priorities.
- The statement does not directly harm but implies that current discussions are misplaced, which could be seen as dismissive of those issues.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It challenges the focus of public discourse, which could promote understanding if it leads to a more balanced discussion of threats. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement critiques the focus of public discourse but does not engage in personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.