Jill Stien

Rank 40 of 47
|
Score -92

The statement is a strong critique of U.S. political support for Israel, accusing both major political parties of enabling harm to children in Gaza. It uses charged language, such as 'genocide' and 'starvation,' to emphasize the severity of the situation and calls for political change by advocating for the Green Party.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses emotionally charged language that could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially escalating tensions rather than fostering constructive dialogue. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others, as it uses graphic descriptions and imagery to make a political point. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    While it aims to promote empathy for the children of Gaza, the language used may hinder understanding and compassion by polarizing the audience. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in strong criticism of political parties but does not engage in constructive dialogue or offer specific solutions beyond advocating for a political shift. [-1]