Jill Stien

The statement questions the radical nature of certain images compared to college students protesting them. It implies a comparison between visual depictions of conflict or crisis and the actions of protesters, potentially sparking debate on the nature of radicalism.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement could be seen as provocative, potentially inciting strong reactions without clear intent to harm, but it does not explicitly promote harm.
2. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it frames the issue in a confrontational manner without fostering dialogue. [-1]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement invites debate but does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it lacks context or explanation. [-1]