The statement engages in public discourse by addressing a highly sensitive and controversial issue related to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. It references a poll and uses strong language to criticize Israeli public opinion and government actions, calling for a boycott. The tone is accusatory and inflammatory, potentially inciting further division.
- The statement uses inflammatory language that could contribute to harm by escalating tensions and promoting hostility. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement could be seen as disrespectful and potentially harmful to the dignity of Israelis by generalizing and attributing extreme views to a large group of people. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it uses divisive language and does not encourage dialogue or reconciliation. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, instead opting for a blanket condemnation of Israel as a 'pariah state.'Â [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to call for a boycott, which could be seen as an attempt to influence public opinion and policy, but it does so in a way that may not contribute positively to societal betterment due to its divisive nature. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- While the statement exercises free speech, it does so in a manner that may not be responsible or uphold integrity, given the potential for inciting further conflict. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.