Jill Stien

The statement is a rebuttal to a claim about an incident involving civilians and aid distribution in Gaza. It challenges the accuracy of the original claim and provides an alternative narrative, suggesting a different location and context. The tone is assertive and aims to correct perceived misinformation.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement attempts to correct misinformation, which aligns with striving to do no harm by clarifying facts. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but the assertive tone could be seen as confrontational.
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on refuting the original claim without fostering dialogue. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in personal attacks but lacks constructive dialogue, focusing instead on refutation. [-1]