Mike Johnson

Rank 32 of 47
|
Score -9

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of border security and its implications for national security, criticizing the current administration's handling of immigration policies. The tone is accusatory and places blame on President Biden for perceived failures in national security.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not strive to do no harm, as it attributes blame for a terror act to a specific individual, potentially inciting division and hostility. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the dignity of others, as it indirectly targets an individual based on nationality and immigration status, which could be seen as contributing to hate speech. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on blame rather than constructive solutions. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it uses a personal attack on President Biden rather than addressing policy specifics. [-2]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to criticize the administration, but it does not contribute positively to societal betterment, as it lacks constructive suggestions. [-1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that lacks responsibility and integrity, as it could incite fear and division. [-2]