Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement criticizes a former spokesperson for allegedly supporting actions they privately disagreed with, specifically regarding Israel and alleged war crimes. It questions the integrity and motivations of the individual, suggesting they continued to lie publicly. The tone is accusatory and critical.
- The statement could be seen as harmful by accusing someone of supporting serious crimes, potentially impacting their reputation. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not respect the privacy or dignity of the individual, engaging in public criticism without clear evidence. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote constructive dialogue, instead focusing on personal attacks. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.