Jill Stien

The statement raises concerns about privacy and government surveillance, using a provocative tone to engage the audience. It questions the implications of data collection by referencing Palantir Technologies and its potential impact on privacy and governance.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement aims to raise awareness about potential privacy violations, aligning with the principle of doing no harm by highlighting risks. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It respects privacy by advocating against intrusive data collection, but the tone could be seen as alarmist.
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement promotes understanding of privacy issues but does so in a way that may incite fear rather than empathy. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in criticism of data practices but lacks constructive dialogue, focusing instead on potential negative outcomes. [-1]