Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement makes serious allegations against a public figure, using inflammatory language and historical references. It accuses the UN of electing a 'German war criminal' and implies a connection to historical events, which could be misleading and harmful. The tone is accusatory and lacks evidence to support the claims.
- The statement uses harmful language by labeling someone a 'war criminal' without evidence, which can cause harm. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It disrespects the dignity of the individual by making unsubstantiated claims, potentially engaging in defamation. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, instead it uses divisive language. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It fails to engage in constructive criticism, opting for personal attacks instead of reasoned dialogue. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.