Matt Taibbi

The statement uses sarcasm to criticize the act of online shaming, suggesting it lacks moral justification. It engages in a broader discussion about judgment and morality, referencing a biblical passage to highlight the hypocrisy in public shaming.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement uses sarcasm, which may not promote understanding or empathy, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The sarcastic tone could be seen as disrespectful, potentially violating the principle of respecting others' dignity. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement indirectly promotes reflection on moral behavior, aligning with promoting understanding. [+1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The sarcastic tone may hinder constructive dialogue, potentially violating the principle of engaging in constructive criticism. [-1]