Reposted by Congresswoman Ayanna Pressley
The statement criticizes the rescinding of guidance related to abortion care during medical emergencies, framing it as a political move that undermines women's rights and safety. It uses strong language to emphasize the perceived moral and legal failings of the decision.
- The statement aims to highlight potential harm caused by the policy change, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It criticizes the actions of a political administration, which is a public entity, thus not violating privacy or dignity of individuals. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement seeks to promote understanding and empathy for those affected by the policy change, particularly women in medical emergencies. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The language is strong and accusatory, which may hinder constructive dialogue and could be seen as a personal attack on the administration. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.