Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement addresses a serious and ongoing public issue, namely the conflict between Israel and Palestine, and the impact on civilians. It presents a critical view of Israel's actions and implies misconduct by suggesting that Israel attempts to cover up civilian casualties.
- The statement uses strong language that could potentially incite harm or hostility, thus not fully adhering to the principle of doing no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but it does make serious accusations against a nation, which could be seen as lacking respect for dignity if not substantiated. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on accusations rather than fostering dialogue or solutions. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it presents a one-sided view without acknowledging other perspectives or engaging in a balanced discussion. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement could be seen as using influence to highlight an issue, but it does so in a way that may not contribute to the betterment of society due to its accusatory tone. [-1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but may not do so responsibly, as it could contribute to polarization rather than informed discourse. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.