The statement is a strong critique of technology companies' involvement in military and surveillance activities, particularly in relation to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. It accuses these companies of contributing to human rights abuses and calls for action against specific projects.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement aims to raise awareness about potential harm caused by technology in military applications, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. However, the use of charged language like 'genocide' may be seen as inflammatory.
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.The statement respects privacy but uses strong language that could be interpreted as accusatory, potentially affecting the dignity of those involved in the projects.
[-1]Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.It seeks to promote understanding and empathy by highlighting the impact of technology on human rights, but the tone may hinder constructive dialogue.
[-1]Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement engages in criticism of tech companies and their projects, but the language used could be seen as a personal attack rather than constructive criticism.
[-1]