Jill Stien

Rank 35 of 47
|
Score -41

The statement criticizes US leadership for vetoing a UN resolution on a Gaza ceasefire, suggesting a continuation of harmful policies. It expresses frustration and moral condemnation of both Trump and Biden's administrations.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement implies harm by accusing US leadership of perpetuating horror, which may not align with striving to do no harm. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech but uses strong language that could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, focusing instead on condemnation. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    It criticizes US policy but does not engage in constructive dialogue, using strong language instead. [-1]