In reply to:
Mike Benz
@MikeBenzCyber
·
33d
The statement is a reply to a conversation that criticizes the National Endowment for Democracy (NED) and its alleged role in inciting riots, which constitutes public discourse as it engages with public funding and the activities of a government-related organization.
- The original statement by @MikeBenzCyber uses inflammatory language that could be seen as harmful, potentially inciting anger or fear without providing evidence, thus violating the principle of doing no harm. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement indirectly accuses individuals and organizations of serious actions without substantiated evidence, potentially disrespecting their privacy and dignity. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it uses accusatory and inflammatory language rather than fostering constructive dialogue. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it uses a confrontational tone and makes personal attacks against individuals and organizations. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that lacks responsibility and integrity, as it makes serious accusations without evidence. [-2]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.