Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement addresses a public issue concerning the federal government's actions regarding the California National Guard, suggesting that the move is inflammatory and unnecessary. It implies a critique of federal intervention and supports local authorities' capabilities.
- The statement suggests that the federal government's actions are harmful by escalating tensions, but it does not directly use harmful language itself.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement aims to promote understanding by highlighting the capability of local authorities and questioning the necessity of federal intervention. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the federal government's actions without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech by critiquing government actions and uses the platform to discuss public policy responsibly. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.