Reposted by Dr. Jill Steinš»
The statement is a strong critique of ICE and the potential deployment of federal troops, reflecting a stance on public safety and federal intervention. It uses charged language to convey urgency and disapproval.
- The statement uses strong language that could incite fear or tension, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm.Ā [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy of individuals but could be seen as contributing to public tension, which may indirectly affect dignity.Ā [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it uses confrontational language.Ā [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but does not foster constructive dialogue either.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.