In reply to:
Tim Pool
@Timcast
·
20h
Inevitable West
@Inevitablewest
·
1d
The statement 'Nuts' in response to a conversation about the UK government and terrorism designations is dismissive and lacks substantive engagement with the serious issues being discussed. The original conversation involves claims about government actions and potential implications for citizens, which are significant public concerns. The reply does not contribute constructively to the dialogue.
- The dismissive tone does not strive to do no harm, as it trivializes a serious issue. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of others, as it dismisses concerns about potential mislabeling of citizens. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it fails to engage with the underlying issues. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it offers no substantive argument or perspective. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.