Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement critiques the establishment of ICE and its connection to post-9/11 policies, highlighting perceived contradictions in political stances. It engages in public discourse by addressing issues related to government surveillance and political ideologies.
- The statement does not directly harm others but uses strong language that could be perceived as inflammatory, potentially leading to divisive reactions. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it uses a critical tone without offering constructive dialogue or solutions. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement critiques a political stance but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, focusing instead on policy critique. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech by critiquing government policies and political ideologies, using the platform to express a viewpoint on public issues. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.