The statement criticizes certain individuals for their actions during a protest, labeling them as non-peaceful and suggesting they should be arrested. It also attributes blame to a political figure for the conditions leading to these actions.
- The statement aims to address harmful actions, aligning with the principle of doing no harm, but it could escalate tensions by attributing blame.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy but could be seen as inflammatory, potentially affecting dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in criticism of a political figure, which could be seen as a personal attack rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.