Reposted by Bret Baier
Bill Melugin
@BillMelugin_
·
3d
The statement and conversation refer to a public safety issue involving the LAPD and a potential need for the National Guard, indicating a discussion on public order and law enforcement response. This constitutes public discourse as it addresses societal concerns about safety and law enforcement measures.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but highlights a situation where harm has occurred, maintaining a neutral tone.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is a factual report without additional context or calls for empathy.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, maintaining a focus on the situation rather than individuals. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech by reporting on a public issue responsibly, without sensationalism or bias. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.