Jill Stien

Rank 40 of 47
|
Score -67

The statement appears to be a critique or commentary on the situation involving Israel, possibly suggesting ongoing scrutiny or accountability. The tone is serious and implies that the situation is not resolved, despite the official statement suggesting otherwise.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does not directly cause harm but implies ongoing tension.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It respects privacy but could be seen as provocative, potentially leading to further discourse. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, focusing instead on criticism. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    It engages in critique but lacks constructive dialogue, focusing on highlighting perceived issues. [-1]