Reposted by Steve Scalise
The statement presents a comparison between two scenarios involving the use of masks, suggesting a perceived double standard in how actions are labeled as 'fascism' or 'freedom of speech.' The tone is critical and implies a political bias, aiming to highlight inconsistencies in public discourse regarding law enforcement and protest activities.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could contribute to divisive rhetoric by framing the issue in a confrontational manner. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but it could be seen as indirectly targeting specific groups by framing them negatively. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on highlighting perceived hypocrisy rather than fostering dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it presents a rhetorical question that implies judgment rather than inviting discussion. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that may not be responsible or constructive, as it could exacerbate tensions rather than contribute to a solution. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.