Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement criticizes the western press for its reporting on an incident involving the Freedom Flotilla near Gaza, suggesting that the press is sinister and complicit. It addresses a public issue related to media coverage and humanitarian efforts, thus constituting public discourse.
- The statement uses strong language ('sinister and complicit') which could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does make a broad accusation against the western press, which could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on criticism without offering a constructive path forward. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it makes a sweeping accusation without engaging with specific arguments or evidence. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement attempts to use influence to highlight perceived media bias, which could be seen as an effort to better society by encouraging critical media consumption. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but could be seen as lacking responsibility and integrity due to its accusatory tone without substantiated evidence. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.