The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the portrayal of protests in media. It uses strong language and dismisses opposing views, which may hinder constructive dialogue.
- The statement uses strong language that could be considered harmful, reducing its adherence to the principle of doing no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but the dismissive tone may not fully respect the dignity of others.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it dismisses opposing views without constructive engagement. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement lacks constructive criticism and engages in a dismissive tone, which does not foster dialogue. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.