Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
Stephen Miller
@StephenM
·
51d
The statement criticizes a political strategy of blaming immigrants while allegedly prioritizing the interests of the wealthy and establishing mass surveillance, suggesting this approach undermines the country's values. It engages in public discourse by addressing societal issues such as immigration, economic inequality, and privacy.
- The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm with words. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does use accusatory language that could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on criticism rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not offer constructive dialogue or solutions, and it could be seen as a personal attack on those it criticizes. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement attempts to use influence to highlight perceived societal issues, aligning with the principle of using influence for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech but could be seen as lacking responsibility and integrity due to its accusatory tone. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.