Mike Johnson

Rank 23 of 47
|
Score 40

The statement and accompanying conversation engage in public discourse by addressing issues of border security, economic impact, and public safety. The tone is accusatory and divisive, suggesting a strong stance against certain political figures and groups. It implies a connection between immigration and criminal activity, which can be inflammatory.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement may cause harm by linking immigration to criminal activity without evidence, potentially inciting fear or prejudice. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It does not respect the dignity of others, using language that could be considered inflammatory and accusatory. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement lacks empathy and understanding, focusing on blame rather than constructive dialogue. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    It engages in personal attacks against political figures, rather than fostering constructive criticism. [-2]