Ayanna Pressley

The statement highlights the significance of the Griswold v. Connecticut decision in the context of current political actions affecting reproductive rights. It criticizes specific political figures and parties for their stance on contraception and related healthcare services.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement aims to protect reproductive rights, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
2. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   It promotes understanding of the historical context and current threats to contraception rights. [+1]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement criticizes political figures and parties, which could be seen as engaging in personal attacks rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]
4. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   It uses its platform to advocate for the protection of contraception rights, aiming for societal betterment. [+1]