Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement is a critique of government priorities, highlighting perceived discrepancies in resource allocation between social services and law enforcement. It uses a critical tone to question the government's commitment to public welfare versus its investment in punitive measures.
- The statement does not directly harm individuals but could be seen as critical of government actions, which is a legitimate part of public discourse.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement aims to promote understanding and empathy by highlighting social issues, though it does so through a critical lens. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of government policies without resorting to personal attacks, focusing on systemic issues instead. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to raise awareness about societal issues, potentially contributing to public debate and reform. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech responsibly by addressing public policy issues, though its critical tone may polarize audiences. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.