Jill Stien

Rank 40 of 47
|
Score -71

The statement is a critical commentary on the political actions of Democrats regarding a bill associated with Trump. It suggests that Democrats have the power to stop the bill but choose not to, and it calls for rejecting the two-party system. The tone is accusatory and seeks to provoke action or reconsideration of political allegiances.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses strong language but does not directly harm individuals. It focuses on political critique rather than personal attacks.
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It critiques political actions rather than individuals' personal attributes.
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It is more focused on criticism and urging political change. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue or criticism. It makes a broad accusation without engaging in a detailed discussion or offering solutions. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to challenge the political status quo, which could be seen as an attempt to better society by encouraging political awareness and action. [+1]
  6. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech and uses the platform to express a political opinion, though it could be more responsible by fostering dialogue rather than division.