Reposted by Gavin Newsom
The statement criticizes the Trump Administration's actions in California, suggesting they provoke violence and authoritarianism. It implies a serious concern about the potential abuse of power and its impact on democratic principles.
- The statement could be seen as inflammatory, potentially escalating tensions rather than calming them, which may not align with striving to do no harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does make a serious accusation against a public figure.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is accusatory and lacks a constructive tone. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it makes a strong accusation without offering a platform for discussion. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to raise awareness about potential authoritarian actions, which could be seen as using influence for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech by criticizing government actions, but the tone may not fully align with responsible use of the platform.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.