The statement addresses a public issue related to the nature of protest and its impact on others, specifically in the context of a university setting. It questions the actions of protesters and suggests consequences for their actions, thus engaging in public discourse about the balance between protest rights and others' rights.
- The statement does not directly harm others with words, but it questions the actions of protesters, implying they should face consequences. This could be seen as indirectly harmful if it leads to punitive measures without due consideration.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. It questions the actions of a group without targeting individuals.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion. It focuses on the negative impact of the protest without acknowledging the protesters' perspective or reasons.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue or criticism. It questions the actions of the protesters without offering a platform for discussion or understanding.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses free speech to question public actions, but it could be more responsible by fostering dialogue rather than suggesting expulsion without context.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.