Jill Stien

Rank 37 of 47
|
Score -69

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing immigration policies and deportation statistics under different administrations. It suggests a critique of both political parties, implying a lack of significant difference in their immigration enforcement policies.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement aims to highlight an issue that may not be widely discussed, potentially fostering awareness. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    By presenting a critical view of both parties, it could promote understanding of bipartisan issues in immigration policy. [+1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in personal attacks but rather critiques policy actions, aligning with constructive dialogue. [+1]