Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement and image suggest that both political parties have increased funding for ICE, indicating bipartisan support. This engages with public discourse on government spending and immigration policy.
- The statement is factual and does not appear to cause harm, adhering to the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement could promote understanding by highlighting bipartisan actions, but it lacks context or explanation, which limits its effectiveness in fostering empathy or compassion.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks and presents information that could be used for constructive dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.