The statement and image engage in public discourse by discussing a legislative bill related to national security and U.S. leadership. The tone is promotional and supportive of the bill, presenting it as a necessary investment. It contrasts 'myth' and 'facts' to persuade the audience of the bill's benefits.
- The statement aims to promote the bill as beneficial, which aligns with doing no harm, but it could be seen as polarizing by attributing weak leadership to a specific political group.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement attempts to promote understanding of the bill's benefits, but it may lack balance by not addressing potential criticisms or alternative perspectives.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage with opposing views constructively, instead labeling them as myths, which could be seen as dismissive. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.