Ayanna Pressley

The statement criticizes Republican actions in the House of Representatives regarding budget cuts to public broadcasting and foreign aid, suggesting that the intent behind these cuts is cruelty. The tone is accusatory and critical, aiming to highlight perceived negative impacts of the budget decisions.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, particularly the phrase 'The cruelty is the point.' This could be perceived as attributing malicious intent without evidence, which may not align with striving to do no harm. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does use a harsh tone that could be seen as disrespectful.
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on criticizing the actions of a political group without offering constructive dialogue or solutions. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it uses a personal attack by attributing cruelty as the motive behind the actions, which is an ad hominem argument. [-2]
5. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   The statement uses its platform to influence public opinion against the budget cuts, but it does so in a way that may not contribute positively to societal discourse due to its accusatory tone. [-1]
6. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that may not be responsible or uphold integrity, given the lack of constructive engagement. [-1]