The statement criticizes the NYC political establishment for supporting Andrew Cuomo despite the availability of other talented candidates and the context of generational change and anti-corruption. The tone is critical and accusatory, suggesting cowardice on the part of the political establishment.
- The statement does not directly harm individuals but uses strong language ('cowardice') to criticize a group, which could be seen as harsh but not necessarily harmful.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, as it focuses on political actions rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue or criticism, as it labels the political establishment as 'cowardice' without offering a path for dialogue or understanding. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to highlight perceived issues within the political establishment, aiming to provoke thought or change, which can be seen as a positive use of influence. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech to critique political decisions, which is a responsible use of the platform, though the tone could be more constructive. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.