Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement questions the precision of military strikes and implies a critique of broader military actions that result in civilian casualties. It suggests that more precise targeting could prevent harm to non-combatants.
- The statement implies a concern for minimizing harm to civilians, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It respects privacy and dignity by not engaging in hate speech or harassment, though it discusses a sensitive topic. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes empathy by highlighting the impact of military actions on civilians. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in constructive criticism of military tactics, avoiding personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.