Jill Stien

Rank 38 of 47
|
Score -97

The statement questions the precision of military strikes and implies a critique of broader military actions that result in civilian casualties. It suggests that more precise targeting could prevent harm to non-combatants.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement implies a concern for minimizing harm to civilians, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It respects privacy and dignity by not engaging in hate speech or harassment, though it discusses a sensitive topic. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes empathy by highlighting the impact of military actions on civilians. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    It engages in constructive criticism of military tactics, avoiding personal attacks. [+1]