Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement expresses a critical view of U.S. political support for Israel, suggesting that such support is influenced by external organizations like AIPAC. It implies that the U.S. is under undue influence, using strong language to convey dissatisfaction with political leaders. The tone is confrontational and suggests a divide between 'normal Americans' and politicians.
- The statement uses provocative language that could contribute to divisiveness rather than understanding. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It implies a lack of respect for political figures by suggesting they are controlled by external influences, which could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote empathy or compassion, focusing instead on criticism. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in a form of ad hominem argument by implying politicians are not acting independently. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.