Reposted by Dr. Jill Stein🌻
The statement expresses strong frustration and criticism towards politicians, specifically targeting Lindsey Graham, for their perceived eagerness for war. The tone is aggressive and uses profanity, indicating a high level of emotional engagement. The statement reflects a personal perspective based on the speaker's military experience, addressing the broader issue of political decision-making related to war.
- The statement uses aggressive language and profanity, which could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, violating the principle of doing no harm with words. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but the use of derogatory language towards politicians could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, instead opting for personal attacks and derogatory language, violating this principle. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that lacks responsibility and integrity due to its aggressive tone and personal attacks. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.