Jill Stien

Rank 38 of 47
|
Score -97

The statement is a critical commentary on the actions of a country involved in military operations across multiple regions. It suggests a contradiction between the country's actions and its portrayal as a victim, which is a substantive engagement with public issues related to international relations and conflict.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses a sarcastic tone that could be perceived as harmful or inflammatory, potentially exacerbating tensions rather than promoting peace. [-1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not engage in direct harassment or hate speech, but its tone could be seen as disrespectful to those affected by the conflicts. [-1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on criticism without offering constructive dialogue or solutions. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it uses sarcasm and does not provide a platform for discussion or understanding. [-1]
  5. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that may not be responsible or constructive, given its potential to inflame rather than inform. [-1]