Matt Taibbi

Rank 39 of 47

Score -85

So that’s a total misrepresentation of what I said. It was no “fantasy” that Biden and the “anti-disinformation” project were huge worries — just look at Europe’s draconian new digital censorship laws if you want an example of what tech CEOs feared.

6/13/2025, 5:17:46 PM

The statement addresses concerns about digital censorship laws and the impact of anti-disinformation projects, which are public issues related to free speech and regulation of information. The tone is defensive, aiming to clarify a perceived misrepresentation and to highlight potential threats to free speech.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as contributing to a polarized discourse by framing the issue in a confrontational manner.
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement does not engage in personal attacks but rather focuses on the issue of digital censorship laws and their implications. [+1]
Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
The statement upholds the principle of free speech by expressing concerns about censorship and the impact of regulatory measures on tech companies. [+1]