Matt Taibbi

Rank 39 of 47

Score -85

Yes, Trump has been disappointing on speech, at times very much so, but the choice was him or American versions of the Digital Services Act or the Online Safety Act or NetzDG, horrible laws that criminalize whole ranges of speech. Very disappointing edit by you

6/13/2025, 5:17:46 PM

In reply to:

Matt Taibbi

@mtaibbi

44d

So that’s a total misrepresentation of what I said. It was no “fantasy” that Biden and the “anti-disinformation” project were huge worries — just look at Europe’s draconian new digital censorship laws if you want an example of what tech CEOs feared.

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the implications of digital censorship laws and the political choices related to free speech. It critiques both Trump and certain European laws, indicating a concern for free speech and its regulation.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement does not directly harm others with words or actions, but it does express disappointment in a political figure, which is a form of critique rather than harm.
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive criticism of both Trump and European laws without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. It maintains a focus on policy and its implications. [+1]
Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
The statement upholds the principle of free speech by critiquing laws that are perceived to limit it. It uses the platform to discuss the importance of free speech and the potential dangers of censorship. [+2]