The statement criticizes a decision to reassign National Guard troops from the border to Los Angeles, implying it negatively impacts efforts to stop fentanyl smuggling. The tone is critical and suggests a disagreement with current policy decisions.
- The statement implies harm by suggesting that the reassignment of troops leads to increased drug smuggling, but it does not provide evidence or a constructive solution. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement engages in criticism of a policy decision but does not engage in constructive dialogue or provide alternative solutions. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.