Reposted by Bret Baier
The statement reports on a significant military action involving Israel and Iran, specifically targeting Iran's nuclear weapons project. This is a matter of international relations and security, thus constituting public discourse. The tone is factual, but the statement could potentially escalate tensions or spread fear.
- The statement does not directly cause harm, but reporting on military actions can contribute to fear or tension, which indirectly may cause harm. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is a straightforward report of military actions without context or calls for peace. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, maintaining a neutral tone. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement could use its influence to inform the public, but it does not actively contribute to the betterment of society by promoting peace or understanding.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by reporting on significant events, but it should be presented with responsibility to avoid escalating tensions. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.