POLITICO
@politico
·
22d
The statement addresses the issue of extreme language in politics and its impact on societal extremism, suggesting that such rhetoric is detrimental to the country. It calls for accountability and a shift away from divisive tactics, aligning with public discourse on political communication and its effects.
- The statement highlights the harm caused by extreme language in politics, advocating for a reduction in such rhetoric, which aligns with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By calling for a reduction in extreme language, the statement promotes understanding and empathy, aligning with the principle of using words to foster compassion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement encourages constructive criticism by suggesting that political discourse should move away from making the opposing party look worse, aligning with the principle of engaging in dialogue without personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its influence to advocate for a more responsible and less divisive political discourse, aligning with the principle of using influence for societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by advocating for responsible use of language in politics, aligning with the principle of using one's platform with integrity. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.