Jill Stien

Rank 38 of 47
|
Score -97

The statement criticizes both major political parties in the U.S., accusing them of supporting ICE despite public denunciations. It uses strong language, labeling the parties as 'war-mongering, genocidal, fascist duopoly.' The intent is to challenge the perceived hypocrisy and bipartisan support for ICE.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses harsh language that could be considered harmful, reducing its adherence to the principle of doing no harm. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    The statement does not respect the dignity of others, as it uses derogatory terms to describe political parties. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on criticism without constructive dialogue. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive criticism, as it uses ad hominem attacks rather than reasoned arguments. [-2]