The statement engages in a discussion about the criteria for unilateral military action by a president, referencing the War Powers Resolution. It critiques the omission of key points in the conversation about war powers and military engagement.
Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.The statement does not directly cause harm but is part of a broader conversation that includes potentially harmful rhetoric.
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.The statement attempts to clarify legal criteria, which can promote understanding, but it is embedded in a context with inflammatory content.
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.The statement engages in a critique of the conversation, which can be constructive, but the surrounding discourse includes personal attacks and inflammatory language.
[-1]